nekromantik
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2009
- Posts
- 1,658
- Likes
- 184
how is RA compared to FatFreq MM or MSE?
Oh, you will be treated with the best quality bass. Welcome aboardI think I would join to the Ra-Gang.
Gimme bass, please
If my memory serves right, the bass on Dark Sky is more of midbass and a nice subbass. The bass is quite solid and gets boomy, sometimes which is overwhelming. I loved that set when I had tried it for few days sometimes back. Ra has a very controlled bass something which has good enough quantity but does not overload your brain. Also, Dark Sky is not as resolving and clean in approach as Ra. The midrange on Ra are more matured and detailed. Ra has better technical aspects.Hi, could you compare the RA to the Faudio Dark Sky?
Thanks for the comparison, sounds like the RA is a better and more worth it iem then.Oh, you will be treated with the best quality bass. Welcome aboard
If my memory serves right, the bass on Dark Sky is more of midbass and a nice subbass. The bass is quite solid and gets boomy, sometimes which is overwhelming. I loved that set when I had tried it for few days sometimes back. Ra has a very controlled bass something which has good enough quantity but does not overload your brain. Also, Dark Sky is not as resolving and clean in approach as Ra. The midrange on Ra are more matured and detailed. Ra has better technical aspects.
If you want to talk synergy the RA and Sony Zx707 uncapped version simply perfect big bassy lush perfection
That cable with them, looks something else . May I ask what make?
If you want to talk synergy the RA and Sony Zx707 uncapped version simply perfect big bassy lush perfection
You won't believe how much power the Ra can take and it sound quite open and spacious. A good DAP and Aroma A100TB is a killer combo for Ra. With Earmen Angel, the power helps, but the DAC on Angel is not enough.Thanks for the comparison, sounds like the RA is a better and more worth it iem then.
How is the RA with an external amp? Like the aroma or earmen angel
XHINS HS09That cable with them, looks something else . May I ask what make?
I still own the MM and can say that the RA outperforms it in all registers, excepting the low-end department while both tunings differ. The MM is sub-bass focused with less midbass than the RA. The MM does sound very « clean » and « clear ». The RA is more romantic and full sounding.how is RA compared to FatFreq MM or MSE?
thanksI still own the MM and can say that the RA outperforms it in all registers, excepting the low-end department while both tunings differ. The MM is sub-bass focused with less midbass than the RA. The MM does sound very « clean » and « clear ». The RA is more romantic and full sounding.